Trump replies to DOJ appeal to resume criminal probe of Mar-a-Lago documents

Written By Nobias
 

We ran the numbers: There are 1,732 news articles covering this topic.
51% (885) are left-leaning, 24% (412) are centrist, and 25% (435) are right-leaning.

Judge Aileen Cannon of the U.S. District Court said there was no proof Trump attempted to divulge secrets, despite the Justice Department's insistence that the investigation is urgent because classified data were taken.

USA Today published a centrist article about how a judge blocked the review while a special master reviews them for personal papers or communications with lawyers. About 100 classified documents were among 11,000 documents seized at Mar-a-Lago. Trump's lawyers argue he has a personal interest in those documents, whether they're classified or not. 11 state attorneys general filed a document supporting Trump, arguing against the Justice Department's appeal.

A left-leaning article from Washington Post highlights that a coalition of GOP state attorneys general submitted an amicus brief devoted to criticising the Biden administration's approach to managing legal issues. It has absolutely nothing to do with the search itself or even the order that is being challenged. According to the brief, the Trump administration cannot be relied upon to accurately represent the information regarding the Mar-a-Lago search. It doesn't go into any detail about Trump's decision to hold onto potentially highly sensitive documents.

A right-leaning article from Washington Examiner highlights how the GOP attorney brief is devoted to attacking the Biden administration and its handling of legal matters and argues that the Trump administration can't be trusted in its representations of the facts about the Mar-a-Lago search but doesn't delve at all into Trump's retention of sensitive documents that could be highly sensitive.

Nobias
Previous

Biden invites Elton John to perform at the White House
Next

NYC Mayor Blames Republicans' 'Failure' for Migrant Suicide